How were the pyramids at Giza Constructed Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

How were the pyramids at Giza Constructed - Essay ExampleThe great pyramids consist of huge stone blocks, carefully measured out and carved, and thence slotted in to fit a perfect geometric shape on a truly long scale. Scientists today are still trying to figure out how a nation without modern lifting equipment and outfit transportation could possibly have had the technical skill and physical power to construct these tall edifices in the sandy ground. The fact that the Egyptians possessed such a capability is undeniable, since the pyramids are still standing in that location as evidence. How these people managed this great feat is, however, a deep mystery.It has long been recognized that the ancient Egyptians apply ramps and wooden sleds to transport huge blocks of stone from the quarries to the building site, and that in that location is no evidence that they knew about the wheel, the pulley-block or the derrick (Dunham, 1956, p. 161). It seems that they just built ramps and u sed many thousands of workers, and this simple explanation is widely accepted. Another, much more than radical theory has been advanced by Danish scholar Erich von Dniken who argues that it would have taken compassionate beings some 600 years to build the great pyramid of Cheops, the largest of the pyramids at Giza, shifting more ii and a half million blocks of stone (Von Dniken, 1970, p.96) and using tens of thousands of workers at any one time. He theorized that there was insufficient food and shelter for such a number of workmen in the largely desert tear around the area, and that therefore the ancient Egyptians must have had help from some supreme god-like beings from outer space. solicitation arguments gathered from other massive structures across the planet, and from legends about Egyptian gods such as Ra, who travelled done the heavens on a bark (Von Dniken, 1970, p. 94), the theory of ancient aliens helping to build the pyramids emerged.The two theories outlined above argue on very different principles. Von Dnikens argument is ground on vivid